Article Home & Garden in New York Times February 3, 2010
Reactionaries? Make That ‘Collectors’
Reactionaries? Make That ‘Collectors’

TREASURE HUNT A worket at the ACF China
furniture factory with a refurbished trunk.
By DAN LEVIN
Published: February 3, 2010
Beijing

Shiho Fukada for The New York Times Shopping
the Panjiayuan antiques market.
CONTESTANT No. 3, a portly man in suspenders named Cui Xiaosong,
clutched a golden mallet and gulped like an executioner having second
thoughts. As a guest on
China’s wildly popular antiques reality show “Collection World,” Mr.
Cui knew he might have to get violent before the next commercial break.
The victim? A delicately painted vase he had brought to the show, which
he believed to be from the Qing dynasty and worth about $30,000.
“If it’s a fake, will you smash it?” asked the program’s white-gloved
host,
Wang Gang, as Mr. Cui faced the studio audience and three guest
judges.
Mr. Cui nodded. The audience quieted down and Mr. Wang used the final
minute to impart a bit of wisdom about collecting antiques in modern-day
China: “Just as China opened up, so too is collecting about opening the
mind to understand the outside world.”
It was hard to tell whether Mr. Cui was listening, but he certainly
heard the host announce the judges’ verdict: “It’s a modern
reproduction!”
Mr. Cui winced as he swung the mallet, shattering the vase — and with
it his dreams of the wealth it might have brought at auction. Cue the
instant replay.
Some four decades after the Cultural Revolution, when many of the
country’s centuries-old treasures were defaced or destroyed as a result
of Mao’s command to eradicate “the four olds” — old ideas, old culture,
old customs and old habits — China has reversed its attitude toward
antiques. Ming dynasty porcelain vases, 19th-century hardwood furniture
and even early 20th-century calligraphy ink pots have become popular
status symbols for an emerging middle class eager to display its new
wealth and cultural knowledge. The antiques market has become so hot, in
fact, that it has given rise to a new category of must-see TV here.
In recent years, “Collection World” and a dozen other similar shows —
with names like “Treasure Appraisal” and “Art Collector” — have been
luring both serious collectors and armchair enthusiasts, offering
information on collecting trends and appraisal techniques, and
encouraging a new wave of treasure hunting.
While some in the antiques world laud these programs for turning
antiquing into a national pastime, others are skeptical of their
educational value. As Yan Zhentang, the president of the Chinese
Collectors’ Association, noted, “These shows certainly help get ordinary
people interested in antiques, but the bottom line is they are just
entertainment, and they make mistakes.”
Daniel Newham, a British expatriate who has become a popular
television personality in China, said he was dismayed by the lack of
professionalism when he served as a celebrity judge on an episode of
“Collection World.”
“The other judges were pretty awful,” Mr. Newham said, adding that
one of them admitted to him that he had only recently started working in
the field of antiques and did not have the skills to properly appraise
the featured items. (The show’s executives declined to comment and
refused to allow Mr. Wang, the host, to be interviewed.)
Nevertheless, the shows have attracted a devoted following. Zhou
Yajun, a long-distance truck driver and collector from Hebei Province,
near Beijing, said he watched “Collection World” and other antiques
shows every week, testing his appraisal skills against those of the
judges in the hope that he could learn to outwit the counterfeiters who
prey on the country’s amateur antiquarians.
Mr. Zhou, 38, said he began collecting antiques four years ago, and
his hobby quickly became all-consuming. “For a week after I bought my
first antique, I would hug it to sleep, I was so excited,” he said,
showing off photos of his favorite purchases on his cellphone during a
morning of poking around
Panjiayuan, Beijing’s vast antiques market.
Mr. Zhou said he had spent the equivalent of $12,000 so far feeding
his addiction, a hefty sum for a man who earns less than $18,000 a year.
But spending so much time alone on the road takes an emotional toll, and
collecting has become a way to fill the void.
“If I don’t see my antiques for a few days, I miss them,” he said.
“The problem is, everyone wants to collect now, so there’s not much
of the real stuff left,” he added, eyeing some rusty coins advertised as
100 years old before shaking his head and moving on to the next vendor.
Distinguishing real Chinese relics from their latter-day replicas can
be a daunting task, especially since forgers have access to the same
televised information that collectors do. “I used to go to the
countryside to buy antiques,” Mr. Zhou said. “But lately I’ve found the
peasants are buying fakes and making up a story to pass the pieces off
as authentic.”
Perhaps wisely, Mr. Zhou has come up with his own way of evaluating
authenticity: “After I buy something, I put it in my home for two days,”
he said. “If I start to like it, it’s real. If not, it’s counterfeit.”
THE Chinese government has become increasingly assertive about
claiming ownership of its national heirlooms. It condemned
Christie’s last year for auctioning bronze sculptures looted from
the capital’s Old Summer Palace in 1860 and, more recently, it
sent out government officials and art historians to inspect the
collections of global art institutions like the
Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Smithsonian for cultural
artifacts that might have been illegally obtained from China. And so,
many private collectors have come to regard their passion not just as a
smart investment, but as a patriotic duty.
“Chinese people are becoming richer and need to be responsible for
our dignity and history,” said He Shuzhong, the deputy director of the
State Administration of Cultural Heritage’s legal and policy department
and the founder of the Beijing Cultural Heritage Protection Center, a
nonprofit organization. “How can China rise peacefully if we cannot
protect our culture?”
But many in the industry acknowledge that the profits driving the
antiques trade are a more powerful incentive than nationalism.
As Yan Xubao, 31, a dealer at the ACF China furniture company in the
Gaobeidian market on the outskirts of Beijing, observed, “Without a free
capitalistic spirit, these antiques would still be buried in the
countryside somewhere.”
Mr. Yan is a regular at many of the city’s antiques wholesale
markets, where peasants bring old broken furniture, farming tools and
stone carvings collected from the outer provinces. Such items are bought
by urban restorers, like those at ACF, who resell the repaired pieces,
often at a huge markup.
While the global economic crisis has affected ACF’s wholesale
business, which often exports to retailers abroad, its retail sales have
remained relatively robust because of the strength of the Chinese
economy and the antiques industry’s growing grassroots base in China,
said Roger Schwendeman, founder and one of the company’s managing
partners.
Mr. Schwendeman, an American who has worked in China’s antiques trade
for eight years, said Chinese buyers are still paying top dollar for
jade and furniture from the Ming and Qing dynasties made from rare
hardwoods like yellow rosewood and ebony, which most foreigners ignore.
“Western buyers ask about history, while Chinese are interested in
the value of the material,” he said, over the noise of hammering and
sawing, as a trio of workers restored an ornately carved rosewood
cabinet at his factory outside Beijing.
Many of those same foreigners who bought up troves of China’s
antiques in the 1980s and ’90s are now seeking out the increasingly
wealthy mainland Chinese buyers, Mr. Schwendeman added. “They know the
money and passion are in China.”
 |